@lightweight There's two things I dislike about that article: 1) it implies that Microsoft was responsible for the home market, because of BASIC. This is a specious argument, because they weren't the onlyh suppliers of BASIC and other languages existed. e.g., I encountered Fortran as a teenager before I did BASIC.
and 2) the article totally ignores Microsoft's anti-competitive monopoly and keeps claiming that marketing kept them in the forefront; #bullshit
@lwriemen huh, good points!