@A11yAwareness yes, this. It'd be so cool if word processors had fully semantic interfaces rather than an unholy jumble of ad hoc and semantic styling that prevails today... It would benefit anyone trying to automatically parse documents. As it is, almost nobody realises they're creating poorly structured documents.
@lightweight @A11yAwareness What makes things worse is that even if you want to do it correctly, especially Word makes it unreasonably difficult to do so because every time you dare to paste anything into the document you have no idea what the styling is.
Brought to you by "Oh, this must be a header 1, it looks ljust like the others. Nope, it's a header 2 that has been manually styled", and other bestsellers.
@loke yup. It's not the sort of software I use... @A11yAwareness
@lightweight @loke @A11yAwareness Although to be fair, it's not a Word-specific problem, it's the way that people have a goal in mind and hunt for any way to get there, as soon as they find any route that's the one they stick with.
For some reason wordprocessors in general make "choose a font, size, bold, italic" really encouragingly obvious, so that's what people use.
That's because the goal of the software is not to "make a structured document", it's "make something that OK on paper" ...
@loke @yojimbo @lightweight @A11yAwareness
I prefer to use LyX which gives you the power of TeX/LaTeX in a graphical interface. The interface is different enough to break bad word processing habits, but once you learn to use it, you wonder why you ever put up with a bad word processor, like MS Word.