Follow
Bad enough that Wired @willknight continues to call Llama 3 "open source", spreading Meta propaganda. Error is compounded when it's in the context of an article where at least one of the other models discussed actually *is* open source (taking Mistral's Apache 2 license statement at face value).
https://www.wired.com/story/metas-open-source-llama-3-nipping-at-openais-heels/
https://opensource.org/blog/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-open-source by @ed
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama3?tab=License-1-ov-file#readme Llama 3 license same problems as Llama 2 license
@johns @willknight @ed I am so tired.
@johns @willknight with the release of the latest draft, we're ready to start building a list of Open Source AI systems https://discuss.opensource.org/t/draft-v-0-0-8-of-the-open-source-ai-definition-is-available-for-comments/315/
That should help drive the conversation