@rysiek@mastodon.technology
That definition leaves out postmarketOS ;)
As they are based in Alpine linux.

@brainblasted

all of the GNU replacements in Alpine owe to GNU in that they were developed because of GNU ;-P
one could say they're Not-GNU in the same way that GNU's Not-Unix
@lxo Hm, I don't really agree. I don't think any components of Alpine are majorly influenced by GNUs design; at least not as much as the BSDs influenced them. I think the only thing Alpine really "owes" to GNU is its use of the GPL for packages like Linux.

GNU is not UNIX, but it was heavily modeled around it. Alpine isn't really modeled GNU.
I was kidding, but we shouldn't underestimate the power of hatred as a motivator. a lot of the GNU replacement software that goes in Alpine was developed out of hatred, not specifically towards GNU, but as a reaction to GNU and to the fact that GNU was the operating system that Torvalds chose to run on top of the kernel he wrote, and that made GNU+Linux software, cooperation and competition the driving forces for much of what the software freedom communities accomplished afterwards. some perceptions may vary depending on one's alignment and role in that history, and counterfactuals are not good as evidence, but even if either or both could have made it by itself, together they made quite a hit, and it's not viable or sensible to try to find which one of the two had a higher impact or can lay larger claims of merit, any more than trying to figure out whether it's the hydrogen or the oxygen that propels the rocket: the power comes, and came, from combining them
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml