@zak I am more hopeful the distributed management of mastodon is a strongness rather than weakness. But I am also in the opinion that for the personal ”content” that is public, a personal website where I have clear control and ownership is good and where I store public content. But sure, some sort of content is of course on others platforms. Maybe you should consider to run your own instance.
@zak So, it seems as at least to considerations on social media; why and what and for whom I publish on social media, and secondly we cannot trust social media will store for me especially when I not pay them (another issue is of course everything they store (and share) that I do not want them to store.
@hehemrin This is true, but I've absolutely been spoiled by the simplicity and ease of use of large, public social networks. Why put in that effort if the solution has been built for me? And if that solution disappears, why put in that effort to make my personal ramblings only somewhat public and interactive when I could just easily keep them private? If anything, I lose the social aspect, but I gain the benefit of privacy and encryption that's entirely under my own control.
I don't know. I'm still sort of struggling with the whole situation. I don't see myself maintaining a personal hosted solution, though, if not only because of the additional effort required.