I love* reading people's Very Confident Takes on LLMs and copyright.

Curiously, none of them appear to be copyright lawyers.

Or indeed any kind of lawyer.

Follow

@neil I have a take on LLMs and ethics: if the input ("training) data is hidden because it contains stuff where authors may have wanted attribution, then it's unethical to use that LLM. This includes all the big ones like "claude" or "gemini" or "chatgpt" or whatever their names are. It's wrong to use such a system. People shouldn't use it. People who use it are doing wrong and should stop immediately, and they should apologise for having used it and do further penance yet to be determined.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml