Artificial Intelligence
In its defence against the New York Times, OpenAI is claiming it's impossible to train large language models without using copyright material. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/jan/08/ai-tools-chatgpt-copyrighted-material-openai
Their logic appears to be "if we say the alternative is no AI, the court will have to agree we can do it." In my opinion there is equal likelihood the court will say "in that case, no AI."
Artificial Intelligence
@leighelse I think it's even much more likely that the court will say "no AI". Whatever benefits the so-called "OpenAI" organization claims can come from the so-called "AI", it is not the court's job to protect that. The court should focus on the law.
If someone says "what I am doing is illegal, but..." then that is not going to go well in court.
They could argue that way to politicians, trying to change he law. But it should not work in court.
Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.
Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.
(Source code)