AI is leading to a tragedy of the commons: It is overgrazing the commons, scraping up everything it can, and is also being used to pollute the commons with untrustworthy content.
@Julia You make really good points --- and we need a better metaphor than the apocryphal "tragedy of the commons". On its eugenicist origins, see:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/the-tragedy-of-the-tragedy-of-the-commons/
@emilymbender OMG - thank you for pointing out. Good grief! But can we steal the idea back from him? It is such a good metaphor.
@Julia I think we probably need a new one --- because ordinary people working with a public good treat it as a public good. The tragedy (as you point out in your piece) has to do with profit-incentive driven big tech & billionaires...
@Julia @emilymbender what those big tech companies are doing is disgusting, but I'm thinking what needs to happen is not so complicated after all: whoever makes such a system must be required to declare exactly what "training" data they use as input and if even a single one of those inputs requires attribution, like Wikipedia, then the system is obviously illegal to use.
I do realize that this is very far from what is happening now. But still. In principle the issue could be handled like that?
@Julia @eliasr @emilymbender 1) Do you have any comment on the work/plans Mozilla has for AI? I haven't followed in detail, I add a link to their blogpost. 2) The latest Thundercast pod #4 (from Thunderbird e-mail client) discussed the AI talks at the recent Mozilla all employee gathering. 3) There is also a white paper: "Creating Trustworthy AI. a Mozilla white paper on challenges and opportunities in the AI era." Comment if you want and have time! https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/introducing-mozilla-ai-investing-in-trustworthy-ai/
@eliasr @emilymbender transparency about training data would be a good start!