@lionirdeadman@fosstodon.org

> > Like the headline of that article referred to.
>
> The letter explains it and I agree with that.

So you agree that the headline of that vice.com article is wrong?

> I still believe that you are [dishonest]
> even if it's not intentional.

Is it possible to be unintentionally dishonest? I think then it should be called something else, maybe "misguided" or something.

Anyway, thanks for at least allowing for the possibility that I am not intentionally dishonest. 🙂