@lionirdeadman@fosstodon.org

> You misspelled "something" as "somthing"

Oh, thanks, I corrected that now.

> You have not addressed my concerns

I'm sorry, let me try to do that now.

> You have continued claiming
> the open letter is a mob attack.

There I think you put words in my mouth. But if what you mean is that I have pointed out that many people have together attacked a single person with a focus of trying to paint him as a terrible person, then, well, that's just what happened.

1/?

@lionirdeadman@fosstodon.org

> You have continued claiming about CoC breaking

In my opinion, the open letter does not follow the advice of "Be friendly, Be empathetic, Be respectful", from the GNOME CoC. Do you have a different opinion about that?

> and then you claimed to be confused
> and wanting to hear the opinion of gnome developers

Yes, I have a hard time understanding how people working with GNOME projects can think signing such a letter is okay. I do want to hear then explain their thinking.

2/?

@lionirdeadman@fosstodon.org

> You have continued to spread every
> single article defending RMS

That is not true. For example, I have chosen not to spread the "pro-RMS" Github letter because I found it too harsh, too angry. I prefer more constructive dialogue.

3/?

Follow

@lionirdeadman@fosstodon.org

> You continue to claim that people are
> being dishonest even though I've made
> it clear to you that I believe the claims.

You say that as if "the claims" is something that you can believe as a whole. That does not make sense. I have pointed to something specific that is false, I did so also in the article where you found the spelling error. Go and look it up, you will find that there is something false being referred to.

4/?

@lionirdeadman@fosstodon.org

In my opinion, if you make a personal attack (which you should probably not do in the first place), then it is not good if something you reference as basis for accusations turns out to be wrong. Like the headline of that article referred to.

I would like to understand your position regarding that; is it that you don't see anything wrong, or you see there is something wrong but you don't think it matters?

5/?

@lionirdeadman@fosstodon.org

> you are dishonest

No, I am not.

> You piss me off.

That, I cannot argue with. It is probably true. But I would like to help you move from being pissed off, to instead understand what I mean.

I had hoped that the article (with the fixed spelling error) would help, I tried to be very careful with writing that.

Anyway, now I have at least tried to addressed your concerns. I'm going to bed, happy to discuss this more tomorrow.

6/6

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml