elgregor @elgregor@librem.one

@GrapheneOS I think my instance has PMs disabled, I can only set privacy of my posts to public or hidden, not to "only mentioned people". Anyway, you saw the suggestion already. If you want me to delete this reply too, please fave it.

@zahox @anuerysm @jonw @GrapheneOS Good point about PMing them, thanks for the feedback.

@taxalot @eff "Factual" is not the best word to use here. It tries to do what it was trained to do, which is not always what it's supposed to do. (And with the emphasis on "tries".) The quality of the model and its training heavily affect performance. Inadequate training can lead not only to underperformance, but also to textbooks examples of misalignment.

@zahox @GrapheneOS Because I don't see the messages of those other people? Even if I saw them, I would complain to their authors, not here. Also where did you get any blaming from? I simply said that the messages seem angry and asked if GOS team has considered hiring social media people, which I think could help their media presence (and likely help decrease the attacks, since feeding trolls only attracts them).

@zahox @GrapheneOS I'm not saying their behaviour is aggressive, nor that the behaviour of others is OK. I'm only saying that the overall tone of various GrapheneOS posts reads as angry.

@itsfoss Actually, there is one use case for the discussion system that actually makes sense: having it remind you which character is which. Some books feature multiple characters with similar names, which I am terrible at keeping track of.

@itsfoss I guess a few niche use cases of the discussion system exist, like going back to a book you paused reading few years ago and having it give you a summary, or starting a book, wondering "have I read it before", and asking AI if this is the book where X does Y.

But I suspect the "reading recommendation system that suggests similar books based on your selection" will get used more.

@el_haych2024 @itsfoss The problem is that a Chromium monoculture is unhealthy for the Internet.

@EDPS Please push back against privacy-violating proposals like the infamous #ChatControl and badly designed #ageverification.

@zaufanatrzeciastrona 20 kart SIM? Myślałem, że to jakiś zwykły półgłówek, ale może to coś więcej.