Hot Take™

Major changes that are hard to undo shouldn't be decided by a simple majority (like the 51.9% who voted for Brexit).

Requiring ⅔ or ¾ majority is also bad.

Time is the key: schedule 5 referenda spaced over 15 years. If 4 out of 5 return a simple majority in favor, then make the change.

In the US, our constitution requires ⅔ of the House of Reps, ⅔ of the Senate, and ¾ of states to agree. Effectively, the dead rule over us unless we have overwhelming support to overrule them.

In the UK, they allowed a blip in public opinion to throw their country into chaos.

Neither is good.

Follow

@LilahTovMoon For Brexit, it seems fair that leaving the EU required the same size majority as joining. The Common Market referendum of 1975 required a simple majority, also in parliament.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml