Interesting comparison between vs approaches at . They have very different methods of gatekeeping, and has been typically quite a lot more open . And Google has already added some improvements for other app stores. Google says, "hey, we're already trying to find ways to comply" while Apple seems to stick to its guns: "our way is the only way to trusted app stores."

@j2bryson @1br0wn given that exploits are currently selling for more than exploits, I'd say that's one key piece of evidence pointing to Android as the more secure option zerodium.com/images/zerodium_p

@eighthave @j2bryson @1br0wn shouldn't you compare the cost per client, not total cost? If there is 8 times the Android devices, shouldn't the cost be 8 times higher?

@spikebike @j2bryson @1br0wn That could play an role in the pricing, but I'm guessing it is a pretty small role. These exploits are generally sold priced per-target. The governments using them care about getting access to the target, not all the users of a platform.

Follow

@j2bryson @spikebike @1br0wn if so, that's a laughable policy. One of the most basic rules of defense is "don't put all your eggs in one basket". Ahem 0-click amnesty.org/en/latest/news/202

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml