Debian is polling its developers on whether to permit or ban "AI" contributions.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2026/08/msg00002.html
@RueNahcMohr @lproven I have contributed several things to Debian without becoming a Debian Maintainer or Developer. It really doesn't require any of the things mentioned.
You were told earlier today, in this thread.
https://social.gl-como.it/display/3e3ce0df-156a-820f-9c4b-a0c112038808
What more do you want?
@RueNahcMohr @lproven Many years ago I got my own unknown project packaged in Debian. All it took (aside of technical work) was to find a sponsor among Debian Developers to review and upload it. I got some feedback, applied it and into Debian it went. I've also contributed several patches to existing packages - the maintainer reviewed them, merged them and they're in Debian. It's really no different to any other respectable project out there, nobody gets full commit rights just because they ask.
@RueNahcMohr @lproven I have uploaded my package to https://mentors.debian.net/ and stated that I'm seeking one.
@RueNahcMohr @lproven What you described in your initial post was a path to become a trusted person with direct upload rights to the distribution archive, *not* a requirement to contribute. Debian Maintainers can upload new versions of packages they maintain without having a sponsor, Debian Developers can upload anything. You need to have already contributed for a while in order to become any of them, and I think you'll agree that it's a reasonable requirement.
@dos @lproven
..... so.... what the truth about it then?