> Let's talk about safety of #Pinephone
<<... I'm trying to be a bit inflamatory here, to start the conversation. Nevertheless, the above issues are real. It's really just a numbers game. When the distros will not take safety seriously, by planing for it, testing for it, and verifying the mechanisms they are supposed to ensure are in place for the safety of their users, the odds somehting will happen will stay needlessly high.
Also, don't be a person whose house burns down for FOSS. Ask your favorite distribution's authors what they're doing to make their OS safe. Pine64 itself can only go so far to ensure safety of Pinephone, software you put on your Pinephone matters a lot, too!>>
@grainloom #pinephone
Thanks for the writeup and warning!
Are these points already ducumented / verified elsewhere?
I'll later have a look at #mobian issues. Is there a shortcut to verify whether some oft the problems have already been worked on, @mobian?
@chrichri it's a quote, i didn't write this. hence the ">" and "<<" ">>".
@grainloom Thanks for clarifying. Already wondered why your name doesn't connect to the name from the webpage ;-). Anyway, thanks for bringing it to attention!
