In 1990 63% of published studies claimed to have produced positive results. By 2007 this was more than 85%. "in my view, it’s the scientists who report negative results who are more likely to move a field forward."
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02960-3
https://www.reddit.com/r/Open_Science/comments/j8kyhh/in_1990_63_of_published_studies_claimed_to_have/?utm_source=ifttt
Really interesting thoughts on scientific papers in this classic article. http://blog.thegrandlocus.com/static/misc/is_the_scientific_paper_fraudulent.pdf
#science
Interested in Science and Literature.
Spanish/English