Communist retards are spending their quarantine invading private property and larping and saviors of the poor in the US.
image.png
image.png
@fluffy @deadheat @terryenglish
This might be actual real life anarchists. I'm talking about the hypothetical anarchists who don't need government because they 100% respect other people's choices, including but not limited to the choice of selling and buying real estate.
This might be actual real life anarchists. I'm talking about the hypothetical anarchists who don't need government because they 100% respect other people's choices, including but not limited to the choice of selling and buying real estate.
@nerdman @deadheat @terryenglish sounds like some sort of, anarcholibertarian utopia. it's hard to call such a thing anarchists proper because respecting choices implies some sort of order
@fluffy @deadheat @terryenglish
There is one reason I'm not an anarcho capitalist: I accept that we're not perfect enough to live with some form of government.
Instead I'm a minarchist, and say that the state should be there to enforce borders and security and keep law to a minimum.
I mean, the law assumes you know all of it perfectly. I think that this should be so. And so the law should be simple and short enough that you can read it and learn it and that you get voting rights after completing a good exam on the law.
Imagine. A world without lawyers because everyone knows the law. Where you don't need dedicated judges because everyone knows the law.
I know, impossiburu! But... IDK, I find that it's a thing of beauty, this idea of mine.
There is one reason I'm not an anarcho capitalist: I accept that we're not perfect enough to live with some form of government.
Instead I'm a minarchist, and say that the state should be there to enforce borders and security and keep law to a minimum.
I mean, the law assumes you know all of it perfectly. I think that this should be so. And so the law should be simple and short enough that you can read it and learn it and that you get voting rights after completing a good exam on the law.
Imagine. A world without lawyers because everyone knows the law. Where you don't need dedicated judges because everyone knows the law.
I know, impossiburu! But... IDK, I find that it's a thing of beauty, this idea of mine.
@nerdman @deadheat @terryenglish minimal law is nice until you realize that judges are all boomers, that this is just giving them near total power in interpretation, and that boomers when given power to decide policy will destroy everything to feel good. Where here is justice? If there is no justice, why have law?
I'd prefer anarchy at least you can shoot your way out of it
I'd prefer anarchy at least you can shoot your way out of it
@fluffy @deadheat @terryenglish
No no no nooo.
If everyone knows the law (at least anyone to pass an exam on it), then everyone can be a judge.
I mean if you're a 14 year old braniac who is good enough to pass a rigorous exam, you could be a judge. I mean there would be no judges. Only juries. No legal respresentatives because the defendant would know the law.
Unless they're stupid and can't pass the exam. In their case, nature has already shit on them and nothing can probably be done about them.
No no no nooo.
If everyone knows the law (at least anyone to pass an exam on it), then everyone can be a judge.
I mean if you're a 14 year old braniac who is good enough to pass a rigorous exam, you could be a judge. I mean there would be no judges. Only juries. No legal respresentatives because the defendant would know the law.
Unless they're stupid and can't pass the exam. In their case, nature has already shit on them and nothing can probably be done about them.
@fluffy @deadheat @terryenglish
Also note, since the law would be minimaistic, whole chunks of things would go out the window.
SIMPLE gun control. Something like "felons can't own guns." Simple. That everyone can understand.
Also note, since the law would be minimaistic, whole chunks of things would go out the window.
SIMPLE gun control. Something like "felons can't own guns." Simple. That everyone can understand.
Anarchists would, by definition, respect the property of others and not usurp it, I think.