@newt It's the SAAS electron terminal with a built-in LLM assistant
@scathach you forgot "in Rust" and "with graphics acceleration".

I'm still puzzled as to why the hell a terminal needs GPU acceleration, when urxvt could flood the entire screen at 4k just fine.
@nik @scathach less than a piece of software designed to run on terminal from the late 80s? Are you serious?

@newt@stereophonic.space @scathach@stereophonic.space ...on extremely different modern hardware with extra instructions designed for rendering things to a screen efficiently yes

@nik @scathach except the part where launching a terminal also needs to initialise graphics context, do loads of back and forth between CPU and GPU, etc. This is why these things take forever to load, as Skadi mentioned above.

Using a GPU might be worth it for complex scenes, but a terminal that needs a more powerful computer to print text than what could run UT99 25 years ago is just ridiculous.

@newt @nik @scathach
Font rendering in modern terminal is order of magnitude more complex than it was back in rxvt days, when it was about displaying rows and columns of monospaced characters. Alacritty is both GPU-accelerated and in Rust, and I just don't see how it takes insane amount of time to "initialise the GL context", it opens the instant I release the keys bound to opening a new terminal 🀷

@m0xee @nik @scathach yeah, agreed. A GPU is absolutely required to render this. The 80s mind cannot possibly comprehend the requirements for modern terminal fonts.

@newt @nik @scathach
> A GPU is absolutely required to render this
Of course it isn't, man! I could run GLQuake on my 486 machine with Mesa's software rendering β€” one (!) frame per 6 seconds πŸ˜…
But if that hardware is there anyway β€” in absolute most of today's machines it is, why not use it?

@m0xee @nik @scathach two reasons
1. it isn't always there
2. occasionally it doesn't work.

The latter is the big one here. Graphics drivers even today are a total fuck.
Also, and I reiterate this, how does rendering your terminal on a GPU improve things? I refuse to believe that terminal software isn't a solved problem. Aside from integrating LLMs, how is the bestest terminal today better than urxvt from 2003? In what measurable quantity does one exceed the other?

@newt
I'm using Alacritty with Sway only β€” if your hardware isn't capable of EGL, you'd certainly experience issues earlier than opening the term.
> how does rendering your terminal on a GPU improve things?
I don't know, I've never ever done a side by side comparison myself, it just feels fast and I stumble upon reports of it being fast online all the time β€” and it is attributed to GPU acceleration.
@nik @scathach

Follow

@newt
I personally doubt that it even uses any directly, I think it just relies on what Wayland provides.
> how is the bestest terminal today better than urxvt from 2003
Well, at least it can render colour emojis that do not leave traces when you're scrolling. Some can do neat shit like inline images with sixel β€” and it doesn't make the terminal slow.
@nik @scathach

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml