A lot of people in the comments saying "What's the difference!"
I'm still astounded by the fact some people can't understand that force can be used for different objectives. Simply using force does not mean they are all the same.
b18d2853401b3f772305ef5b60178976e6381ba526ba010fe736e12b4e05ef15.jpg
I'm still astounded by the fact some people can't understand that force can be used for different objectives. Simply using force does not mean they are all the same.
b18d2853401b3f772305ef5b60178976e6381ba526ba010fe736e12b4e05ef15.jpg
🇵🇸
@Polfusilier @Arkana
> traditional values
Nope. Hitler abolished the traditional titles of nobility and pushed propaganda as part of the Lebensborn project to encourage German women to have as many children out of wedlock as possible.
The "traditional values" shit was an addition by GLR, who figured it would play better if he tied Nazism to Christianity.
It irks me that most of you already know this and deliberately ignore it, then tell me I must be secretly Jewish for saying that Nazis are lying cunts. I only say it because it is accurate that Nazis are lying cunts.
> traditional values
Nope. Hitler abolished the traditional titles of nobility and pushed propaganda as part of the Lebensborn project to encourage German women to have as many children out of wedlock as possible.
The "traditional values" shit was an addition by GLR, who figured it would play better if he tied Nazism to Christianity.
It irks me that most of you already know this and deliberately ignore it, then tell me I must be secretly Jewish for saying that Nazis are lying cunts. I only say it because it is accurate that Nazis are lying cunts.
@Polfusilier @Arkana
> First, Hitler didn't abolish titles of nobility,
Yes, he did. The German Revolution stripped them of authority, but Hitler actually abolished use of the titles.
> Second, the Lebensborn program was Himmler's idea
"A guard doesn't relieve another guard without Hitler's approval" was the joke they told. The world's worst micro-manager didn't let a program go on for 15 years if he didn't actually want it to keep going on.
> First, Hitler didn't abolish titles of nobility,
Yes, he did. The German Revolution stripped them of authority, but Hitler actually abolished use of the titles.
> Second, the Lebensborn program was Himmler's idea
"A guard doesn't relieve another guard without Hitler's approval" was the joke they told. The world's worst micro-manager didn't let a program go on for 15 years if he didn't actually want it to keep going on.
@p @Arkana Factually incorrect. in 1919, the Weimar Constitution removed all “[p]ublic legal privileges or disadvantages of birth or of rank.” Additionally, it proclaimed that “[t]itles of nobility are valid only as part of a name and may no longer be conferred.” (Weimar Constitution, art. 109.)
blogs.loc.gov/law/2022/12/titles-of-nobility-in-germany/
blogs.loc.gov/law/2022/12/titles-of-nobility-in-germany/
@Polfusilier @Arkana
> Factually incorrect. in 1919, the Weimar Constitution removed all “[p]ublic legal privileges or disadvantages of birth or of rank.”
This is what I said.
No one's going to call that "Don't wait to marry, he might not come back from the front, squeeze some fuckin' terrible kraut babies" poster anything resembling "traditional values".
> Factually incorrect. in 1919, the Weimar Constitution removed all “[p]ublic legal privileges or disadvantages of birth or of rank.”
This is what I said.
No one's going to call that "Don't wait to marry, he might not come back from the front, squeeze some fuckin' terrible kraut babies" poster anything resembling "traditional values".
@Polfusilier @Arkana
> Are you merely anti NS or anti Germany too?
Germans have been bootlickers/coprophiliacs/pedophiles since time immemorial, which is why they were the target of the first American immigration restrictions, a policy that we should have kept up. Nazism is a symptom of being German, and their complete inability to leave people alone and mind their own business is antithetical to my native culture.
At any rate, no, I am not "anti-Germany", just they have to go back.
> Do you hate all White people?
What do krauts and other filthy Continentals have to do with the rest of the white people?
> Are you merely anti NS or anti Germany too?
Germans have been bootlickers/coprophiliacs/pedophiles since time immemorial, which is why they were the target of the first American immigration restrictions, a policy that we should have kept up. Nazism is a symptom of being German, and their complete inability to leave people alone and mind their own business is antithetical to my native culture.
At any rate, no, I am not "anti-Germany", just they have to go back.
> Do you hate all White people?
What do krauts and other filthy Continentals have to do with the rest of the white people?
@Polfusilier @Arkana
> Why don't you capitalize White?
Because it is not a proper noun or a demonym, you rules-obsessed kidfucking kraut. This is the language of free Englishmen, you're not permitted to create rules here.
> Germans have never been prevented from immigrating to the United States.
Did I say prevented completely, or restricted? ("Prevented completely" would have been an excellent idea.) The Palatines (i.e., filthy krauts) were taxed upon entry into Pennsylvania starting in 1718, forbidden to hold land, etc.; when they requested the right to do so again ten years later, the council voted in favor of considering them a threat to everyone's peace and quiet. Unfortunately, several of them were naturalized in 1739.
1728.jpg
> Why don't you capitalize White?
Because it is not a proper noun or a demonym, you rules-obsessed kidfucking kraut. This is the language of free Englishmen, you're not permitted to create rules here.
> Germans have never been prevented from immigrating to the United States.
Did I say prevented completely, or restricted? ("Prevented completely" would have been an excellent idea.) The Palatines (i.e., filthy krauts) were taxed upon entry into Pennsylvania starting in 1718, forbidden to hold land, etc.; when they requested the right to do so again ten years later, the council voted in favor of considering them a threat to everyone's peace and quiet. Unfortunately, several of them were naturalized in 1739.
1728.jpg
@p @Arkana White is a proper noun if believe the White race is real, why do you think the AP style guide says to capitalize Black but not White? It's because they are kikes. Also, I'm an Anglo American not a German, not that matters as your just trying to gatekeep because you don't have arguments.
Furthermore, you said that Germans were the target of American immigration restrictions not Pennsylvanian ones. In other words, you're moving the goalposts because you lied.
Furthermore, you said that Germans were the target of American immigration restrictions not Pennsylvanian ones. In other words, you're moving the goalposts because you lied.
@Polfusilier @Arkana
> White is a proper noun if believe the White race is real,
It is not, and I am not going to accept any belief system that classifies me with krauts.
> why do you think the AP style guide says to capitalize Black but not White.
Do I look like I give a shit what the AP style guide says, you pedophile?
> Also, I'm an Anglo American not a German,
I don't believe you, but I don't care: as the Germans did to Werner Heisenberg when they classified him as "not Jewish but still basically a Jew", on the basis of your persistence in dry-humping a bunch of dead krauts who distinguished themselves mainly by their complete and utter failure to win a war, you are hereby declared to be basically a kraut (and thus a coprophiliac and a child molester). You have to go back.
> your just trying to gatekeep
"You're". Learn to write English before lecturing me on whether or not "white" should be capitalized. Having a stick up your ass about something that doesn't even matter and missing the forest for the trees is a classic kraut maneuver. Get in the goddamn oven.
> Furthermore, you said that Germans were the target of American immigration restrictions
This place has been America since before the adoption of the US Constitution.
> In other words, you're moving the goalposts because you lied.
I said "first American immigration restrictions". You're the one trying to move the goalposts by saying that it somehow wasn't America when it was a colony. You don't even know what "moving the goalposts" means, apparently. It's retroactively changing the conditions after they have been satisfied: I demonstrated the early restriction of German immigration to America, and you've decided that it doesn't count because it was *too* early.
> White is a proper noun if believe the White race is real,
It is not, and I am not going to accept any belief system that classifies me with krauts.
> why do you think the AP style guide says to capitalize Black but not White.
Do I look like I give a shit what the AP style guide says, you pedophile?
> Also, I'm an Anglo American not a German,
I don't believe you, but I don't care: as the Germans did to Werner Heisenberg when they classified him as "not Jewish but still basically a Jew", on the basis of your persistence in dry-humping a bunch of dead krauts who distinguished themselves mainly by their complete and utter failure to win a war, you are hereby declared to be basically a kraut (and thus a coprophiliac and a child molester). You have to go back.
> your just trying to gatekeep
"You're". Learn to write English before lecturing me on whether or not "white" should be capitalized. Having a stick up your ass about something that doesn't even matter and missing the forest for the trees is a classic kraut maneuver. Get in the goddamn oven.
> Furthermore, you said that Germans were the target of American immigration restrictions
This place has been America since before the adoption of the US Constitution.
> In other words, you're moving the goalposts because you lied.
I said "first American immigration restrictions". You're the one trying to move the goalposts by saying that it somehow wasn't America when it was a colony. You don't even know what "moving the goalposts" means, apparently. It's retroactively changing the conditions after they have been satisfied: I demonstrated the early restriction of German immigration to America, and you've decided that it doesn't count because it was *too* early.
@Polfusilier @Arkana Clearly there's been a divergence; that matters to me about as much as your most recent common ancestor with Jewish people matters to you.
These conversations are starting to give me a headache tonight. I posted a video by Louis Rossman about YouTube shitting on small content creators and it started a massive thread about the Jews. While I enjoy healthy discussion about controversial topics, everyone is one a good one tonight. I just want to crack open a beer and see funny memes.
@charlie_root @11112011 @p @Arkana @Polfusilier
Rossman is dead to me after what he did to Daniel Micay, siding with a lying non-coding Nord VPN YouTuber shill over an actual security expert that upstreams serious fixes to Chromium and the mainline Linux kernel on the daily.
Husky_1690181194076_DVTV13FGUP.png
Rossman is dead to me after what he did to Daniel Micay, siding with a lying non-coding Nord VPN YouTuber shill over an actual security expert that upstreams serious fixes to Chromium and the mainline Linux kernel on the daily.
Husky_1690181194076_DVTV13FGUP.png
Tech nerd drama is peak cringe and first world problems 🙄
Rossman is a smart fellow and makes good content. I don't worship the man or have a parasocial relationship. If he took a side in some minor news cycle issue about engineering and security designs that doesn't mean you need to get emotional about it. It's borderline feminine behavior, ngl.
For example, I admire people like Linus Torvalds and Theo De Raadt, pioneers in Open Source, but I'm never going agree with everything they say or do, because I'm not a robot and I'm not in a cult. We're all individuals with our own brains and personalities 🤷♂️
For example, I admire people like Linus Torvalds and Theo De Raadt, pioneers in Open Source, but I'm never going agree with everything they say or do, because I'm not a robot and I'm not in a cult. We're all individuals with our own brains and personalities 🤷♂️
@charlie_root @11112011 @Arkana @p @Polfusilier
I admit he does some good work promoting causes I care about. I just don't trust him, as I now believe he will give me bad tak- nvm. I am a mad bitch and I am perfectly fine admitting it.
Husky_1690181829138_O9N05TA23S.jpg
I admit he does some good work promoting causes I care about. I just don't trust him, as I now believe he will give me bad tak- nvm. I am a mad bitch and I am perfectly fine admitting it.
Husky_1690181829138_O9N05TA23S.jpg
@Pyrrho @charlie_root @11112011 @Arkana @p @Polfusilier Daniel Micay of Ontario, Canada is a legit histrionic paranoid schizo and Graphmeme would be better without his leadership. As I can see, the repos are still getting updated as for one hour ago, so it's not like the project is dead, either.
> Graph meme
LOL
LOL
This is why I use, PostmarketOS, no drama, just clean good software 💪
@charlie_root @mint @11112011 @Arkana @p @Polfusilier
If you look at the actual features, and mostly the security ones, Graphmeme is still in a league of its own, though. Post market is neat.
If you look at the actual features, and mostly the security ones, Graphmeme is still in a league of its own, though. Post market is neat.
Graphene is still googleware. PostmarketOS is Alpine busybox/Linux. All the security is not necessary on a Pinephone, because it's just simplified phone on a ARM SoC. You're not supposed to store any sensitive data on there, maybe nan's phone number, that's it.
Follow
@charlie_root
> maybe nan's phone number, that's it
I have the phone I have now for an year and a half already and I still have no entries in the address book 🤣
@11112011 @Arkana @Pyrrho @p @Polfusilier @mint
@charlie_root@decayable.ink
LEGEND
