Distressing stuff re: U.S. politics / election
https://www.npr.org/2024/08/14/g-s1-16261/young-black-voters-generation-democrats-conservative-trump-harris-gen-z-millennials
'“We're getting into generations of young Black voters that are not just once removed, but maybe twice or three times removed from a civil rights generation,” Towler said. “The way that they form their identity is less likely to be directly attached to the civil rights struggle...they're less likely to be suspicious of political institutions and they're more likely to support Trump and the Republicans.”'
Distressing stuff re: U.S. politics / election
@dynamic Unmentioned in the article is that the Obama administration oversaw the largest reduction in Black household wealth ever, while protecting the perpetrators and ensuring they got to keep their ill-gotten gains. Given recent history, I don't think the Dems should be surprised that they're losing people who they always assumed they could safely ignore as fully captured voters. The prob is w/ the Dems, not with Black voters.
Distressing stuff re: U.S. politics / election
Disengagement with Democrats is one thing. Support for Republicans is another.
Distressing stuff re: U.S. politics / election
@dynamic We live in a two party system, so you can hardly blame people who feel betrayed or ignored by one party to give the only other option a try. Personally, I think it's obvious that both parties are run by sociopaths who are fully controlled by their campaign donors & their egos. I'm just saying that if the Dems want anyone to vote for them, they should try delivering something, rather than just shaming people. I don't imagine they will tho 🤷♂️
Distressing stuff re: U.S. politics / election
@GuerillaOntologist @dynamic The Dems will rightly say that they have delivered many things, so you really have to qualify that with e.g., quality of life enhancements for the working poor. Funny that the ACA has failed in this regard, but then again it wasn't designed to do that.
Distressing stuff re: U.S. politics / election
@dynamic @lwriemen
Like so many things, the ACA was better than nothing, but just barely. Yes, it improved things for a subset of people, but for those of us who don't fit into that subset, and who also don't have good-paying jobs, we got screwed. My premiums went down by 50% and my deductible went up by 100% Me and most everyone I know will have be go bankrupt before our insurance kicks in. Not surprising the ACA was written by an insurance VP.
Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.
Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.
(Source code)
Distressing stuff re: U.S. politics / election
@lwriemen @GuerillaOntologist
I think the ACA *has* improved quality of life in meaningful ways. There's a big difference between being able to get health insurance with a preexisting condition and *not* being able to get health insurance with a preexisting condition.
Is it sufficient? No.
Is it better than what we had before? Yes, and materially so.
Of course, younger voters also won't remember having had to deal with insurance pre-ACA.