Many people think Bill Gates' story is a rags to riches tale. Those people are sorely mistaken. I know this because I spent a few years working next door to the Mary Gates III research hospital (a nearly kilometer long building) at the University of Washington, named after his well-known mother.
Bill was born with a multi-million $ trust fund. His company was both duplicitous and inept from its very first business transactions. Here's a great history of the early days: https://web.archive.org/web/20051013072349/http://www.vanwensveen.nl/rants/microsoft/IhateMS_1.html
@lightweight "gifted" ??? I think you do have to give Gates credit for finding an OS to present and selling Microsoft's ability. Privilege and luck got him into position, but the sale still had to be made.
Also, the Microsoft monopoly was formed in addtion to this arrangement, but not solely because of it.
The "blunder" part is also questionable, because of IBM's own antitrust burdens. They had to be seen as not bundling HW and OS at that time.
@lwriemen his main attributes are being obscenely rich, totally ruthless, and an untrustworthy partner. Those can help someone 'win' on some level, but they're certainly not worth of admiration. He's no visionary, that's for damn sure.
@lightweight I totally agree with this assessment. I really hate the way many people equate these attributes with technical genious, but you only lower your own credibility by not acknowledging whatever aspects of business acumen allowed Gates and company to build the monopoly.
@lwriemen Thanks π I just don't think what 'skills' Bill Gates has are honourable or admirable.
@lwriemen I honestly don't respect Gates or rate his intellect. Almost every single major advance in tech in the past few decades has caught Microsoft (i.e. Gates) with their pants down.