@emsenn I didn't do or say that. You may block me, for any reason you like. But I still didn't say that.
@lunduke I also don't know if saying I'm unfollowing you, and saying why, because you're a marketer and knowing why engagement does or does not happen is part of that, is unkind. In fact, I meant it as a kind and personal gesture.
Now, what I've said since, since you denied the statement you'd conceded in other threads, is rather unkind. I can tell I don't like you.
Cool. Cool.
So. To sum up:
You found someone semi-sorta-pretendy-famous-lite on the Internet. You don't like that person. So you tell that person why you don't like them?
@lunduke No, originally I found someone who was an online marketer who's work otherwise would appeal to me, but had done this thing that disqualifies them as a potential relationship. So I let them know that.
What came after was based on yoru response, which I still view as a falsehood.
Huh. Okay then.
You want me to have said a thing.
I did not say the thing.
I believe that is the end of that until either
a) You decide that I did not say a thing or
b) I retroactively say the thing.
Good day, sir.
@lunduke Are you saying you did not write and publish within a Youtube video description, on October 9, 2017:
"Mozilla, maker of Firefox, has awarded $100,000 USD to fund the email for RiseUp.net. The email service used by Antifa -- a domestic terrorist organization within the United States."
?
If you did not say that, why is it under your byline, on your video?
@emsenn I definitely wrote that summary.
I was referring to specific government agencies (which I detailed in that episode) and their declaration of Antifa being a terrorist organization. I then went into some reporting (and some conjecture) about what that could mean -- from a legal and tax perspective, as well as from a marketing perspective -- for Mozilla.
It sounds to me like you just don't like the description - didn't contain those details.
But *I* still didn't call them that.
@lunduke You're right, I don't like the description, it's under your name and it's saying Antifa is a domestic terrorist organization. Repeating something as an undisclosed quote and then claiming you didn't mean its content as a quote is a really shady way to write.
You say Antifa in the title, you say Antifa, a domestic terrorist organization in the description. You're like, aware of search engines and keywords, right? This seems... shady, yeah.
@lunduke You represent yourself as a brand online; you've named a self-produced show after yourself. You being aware of someone is not relevant to their ability to know enough to criticise you. Put simply; you're quite loud, you don't have to know me for me to know you.