Anyone who takes an oath the defend the constitution can be prosecuted for following unconstitutional orders. Every single one. Beginning, but not ending with, the first person to give the order.
Obviously, guilty high level individuals with political power will argue differently, but they would be wrong.
@eliasr@peter this thread is very interesting to me, but the assumption that Frump's administration could give a fluid fart about codes of conduct, ingernational law, right-and-wrong, etc looks (ahem!) suspect.
@eliasr @peter
Anyone who takes an oath the defend the constitution can be prosecuted for following unconstitutional orders. Every single one. Beginning, but not ending with, the first person to give the order.
Obviously, guilty high level individuals with political power will argue differently, but they would be wrong.
I hope that clears up the uncertainty.