@davidrevoy I actually like how Firefox has handled AI - small local models, no spying to train AI on my data. For users who insist on using a mainstream online chatbot, it lets them do it without forcing it on others. (And there are more such users than I thought. People who I thought are way too computer illiterate to use AI surprised me by using ChatGPT.)
Firefox lets me translate text locally without big tech spying on my translations. Is this bad because it happens to use neural networks?
@bersl2 Mozilla has a history of being a target of pitchfork-and-torch crowds.
Making these extensions would only make sense if they were preinstalled, as the overwhelming majority of Firefox users don't install any extensions, not even a content blocker.
People are using "AI" as a buzzword, I even saw a literal shampoo use it. I do not believe in the fearmongering that Mozilla Firefox will become a data-stealing browser with user as the product, like OpenAI or Perplexity ones do.
@x41h @elgregor "AI" is a Nazi Bar. There are plausible uses for LLMs but so long as the entire industry is lined up behind literal fascists, multibillionaires, and financiers doing their best to bring on DOTCOM 3.0, I will treat it as actively harmful and people cheering it on, as at best ignoring the bar they're in.
@oddhack @x41h Yeah, the big tech LLM companies are terrible.
AI is a very broad term, encompassing multiple technologies, not just neural networks and especially not just LLMs. Additionally, technologies themselves are one thing, the big tech based on them is another thing. Blaming genetic algorithms for what OpenAI is doing would be silly. Let's use the right words for what we mean.
@elgregor Careful.... Last time I made rational, logical sense to the angry mob carrying pitchforks about AI the moderators hypocritical censorship banned/deleted my post with the ultimate reason being.... "Don't be a jerk".
Doesn't matter what you say if it isnt anti-AI they will burn you at the stake. It's the strangest thing I've ever seen.