Code review is an essential part of team maintenance of . It must be a conversation . Pushing code without review might feel like getting things done, but it creates a form of technical debt. The other maintainers have not taken in the new logic yet, and therefore cannot act on it. That can mean duplication of work or breakage, since the other developer was not aware of the new logic.

@eighthave on other hand when you wanna move fast and break things, code review is waste of time. In case tech debt is at acceptable levels, why bother with reviews?

Follow

@sergii because you need a team that is all on the same page, since they are working together on building something.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml