Magnesium Fuel Cycle Thread 🧵
Because the process to make magnesium requires so much heat, the system stores a lot of heat, and has places where heat "leaks" out of it. If you took some of this waste heat (such as the heat you need to take away to cool down freshly made magnesium) you can run good old steam turbine generators to make electricity on demand. In fact, you might even build a magnesium refinery in decommissioned fossil fuel power plants, where that steam equipment already is!
Magnesium Fuel Cycle Thread 🧵
So the upshot is that renewable energy and magnesium refining probably would complement each other well.
Refined magnesium would allow sunlight captured in one season to be used somewhere else months later.
Temporary fluctuations in production could be evened out by efficiently using the waste heat from the refinery process to generate power.
Momentary spikes in demand are where batteries work the best, and we're well on our way on deploying those.
Magnesium Fuel Cycle Thread 🧵 /EOF
So in a nutshell, that's the Magnesium Fuel Cycle I'm fascinated with. A closed-loop carbon neutral system that's powered by renewables, helps support renewable energy, uses abundant materials, and creates a fuel which might even be good enough to replace fossil fuels in transportation.
I'm eager to keep exploring this idea because it strikes me as something with promise. Onwards!
Magnesium Fuel Cycle Thread 🧵 /EOF
@ACTupper it's all about efficiency. Heating water to power a steam generator does not have the best efficiency. What's the energy loss of the reduction reaction to get the Mg back? Is there any particulate loss during burning and fume management that could cause local environment issues on an industrial scale?
Magnesium Fuel Cycle Thread 🧵 /EOF
@dean As far as particulates and fumes go, if you burn magnesium in open cycle system like we do with fossil fuels, you will release a good bit of magnesium oxide as a particulate smoke. Enough of it can cause "metal fume fever" which while not generally serious, should be avoided.
An advantage with magnesium is that it can be burned in closed cycles with no exhaust, and in fact that's desirable in order to maximize recyclable ashes.
Magnesium Fuel Cycle Thread 🧵 /EOF
@dean The upshot is if you designed an engine or other reactor around the idea of recycling as much fuel ash as possible, you probably wouldn't have too much trouble keeping fumes and emissions to a bare minimum. This is definitely something that needs to be validated though!
Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.
Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.
(Source code)
Magnesium Fuel Cycle Thread 🧵 /EOF
@dean You're definitely right efficiency does become a factor with any thermal cycle, and part of what I want to dig into is what overall system efficiency could look like.
From what I've read, direct magnesium oxide electrolysis requires between 10-12 kwh/kg. Burning magnesium in pure oxygen yields around 6.88 kwh/kg, so there's a real disparity which may or may not be worth it in the end.