Follow

A reprise of my benchmark to add the

My October toots about it for context:
1) social.librem.one/@someunexpec
2) social.librem.one/@someunexpec
3) social.librem.one/@someunexpec

tl;dr – this is based on the build times of a C++ project I’m puttering around with

No real news. The L5 is about twice as fast as the pinephone in this case. Neither is actually fast. My desktop’s best time is 2.3 seconds compared to the L5’s 36

@someunexpectedsparks
Yeah. For the moment, it's not really high end hardware the #Linux phone movement needs. It's the software to give a basic, functional smartphone. (A nice change, historically). We're getting there, but the cheaper the available hardware is, the more developers we can get it to, and the more people we have working on the basics. Once the basic software is down, it's easy to put out hardware that takes better advantage of it.

@someunexpectedsparks Thank you for sharing, however, I doubt a compilation benchmark is representative for typical loads on smartphones.

Isn't there anything more meaningful to benchmark like a browser benchmark? First idea: browserbench.org

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Librem Social

Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.

Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.

(Source code)

image/svg+xml Librem Chat image/svg+xml