Pol: nukes
Everyone keeps saying "Iran must not have a nuclear weapon."
And while this statement is something many people would agree with they aren't all agreeing for the same reasons.
The general public in the US is *scared* of "Nuclear Iran" (some bigotry informs this) --the war hawks aren't scared. They think they are playing chess, believe they can dictate the balence of power through "surgical*" force.
They have failed and we've watched it happen.
*there is nothing surgical about it
Pol: nukes
Many "scary" nations that don't like the US have horrible weapons. So what?
You will die because they close the dialysis clinic in your small town, not because of Iran.
These guys will cheerfully kill tens if not 100k civilians just to have the edge in negotiations about who makes money off the tankers and who gets the plumb trade deals.
The ideological battles are a smoke screen to make Americans scared enough to let them play risk with our lives.
Pol: nukes
My general impression is also that many Israeli believe that Iran _will_ use nuclear weapons to destroy Israel sooner or later, if they get them.
I am not saying that they are right, but this is what they believe.
Pol: nukes
Yeah and a lot of people in the US think the same way which is even more wild.
But this isn't about technology. It's about negotiation and finding reasons to depend on each other instead of hurting each other.
Iran should be an important trade partner for all of these nations to the degree that no one would dream of starting a war because everyone is too busy making dialysis machines.
... or something.
Pol: nukes
@futurebird @juergen_hubert The "change through trade" policy does not work. We, Germans, have tried that with Russia. They used this money to build up a large army to make possible Putins imperialist phantasies. No, to bring peace to the middle east, a strategy just focused on military and / or economy won't work. Diplomatic and cultural initiatives are more important, but also need to be backed up by economic and yes, also military measures.
Librem Social is an opt-in public network. Messages are shared under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license terms. Policy.
Stay safe. Please abide by our code of conduct.
(Source code)
Pol: nukes
@elshid @futurebird @juergen_hubert There was never a "change through trade" policy, there was only a trade policy with complete disregard as to the political, social and human conditions of Russia. Germany got a big economic engine on cheap Russian gas and Russia got unimaginably rich oligarchs and a dictator that for 20 years was very comfy for the islamophobic West*, no matter that he had paneslavist ambitions, because that was a problem for Eastern Europe.
*See: Chechenia.