@ceoln or more human?
Somebody should tell Jeff Bezos that all the *cool* billionaires have microblogging platforms.
Undra när tex våra företag och myndigheter släpper taget om twitter. Undra när våra myndigheter tar tag i att faktiskt tänka igenom sociala media, ägandet av information och värdet av att synas och finnas. Våra skattemedel har gått till Facebook (meta), via instagram också, och säkert twitter också. Vad finansierar vi för att myndigheter ska nå oss med information?
@atheistengineer take pictures of card codes you have already used?, could maybe crowd sources spent gift cards?
@jerry my understanding is that until recently counting past five was considered an advanced skill.
For example, I've almost stopped posting research on the financial sector here because most people who would like to read ten different studies from reputable sources on the "Too Big To Fail" problem in the banking sector just aren't on the Fediverse (yet). On Twitter, there was much greater interest in topics like this.
Similarly, I found it fascinating to watch virologists, epidemiologists, immunologists, and intensive care doctors discuss the covid crisis in real time on Twitter in 2020. 2/
musk is not working as twitter ceo/head twit/whatever comedy title he has.
he is amphetamine and ketamine numbed, twitching and sweating, reacting with goldfish memory in real time and issuing grand decrees 13 times a day to the 112 H1Bs that put up with his shit because they don't want to back to mumbai.
there is no leadership happening. this is hitler in the bunker tweaked out and screaming shit.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2023-06-27/silicon-valley-is-on-drugs
@qurlyjoe it's still storing those same phone number, it never gives up hope that you once more will recall those numbers.
@w7voa I hope this ia shared to normalise, and not other.
@ostrich My apologies, it appears I missed the context of the original post.
@ostrich it's common to quote literally. Transcribing the intended meaning is sometimes practice but is generally consider harmful, because it is easy to accidentally infer ones own biases.
@ostrich you do realise you have no obligation to respond too what you care not about?, If you are trying to suggest that their exist no reason to care; may I suggest you make your self clear on why you think the presidents statement on an ongoing geopolitical event is irrelevant?
@denny nah, liking random posts isn't harmful, just ignore it. It's always best practice to only enforce rules intended to reduce actual harm, or behaviour intended to obscure actual harm. At this point I see no reason to believe liking random posts do either. Whatever they are bots or not should also be considered insignificant, ask why does it matter if an interaction is from a bot or not.
@the_Effekt They were exiled for trying to make things better.
Aspiring Author
I write to learn how to be human
Wealth is a legal fiction
Etiquette politics is harmful
Believer in absolute human rights
Please be kind
English as a second language
Anti-normal