@tek OK but the question I'm asking is: how do you know that some other organisation wouldn't also neglect the power lines if they took over from PG&E? How do you know the problem is specific to PG&E and that there isn't some inherent problem in the region and the economics of delivering power there? Like for example some part of the grid which is abnormally costly to maintain and prevents adequate investment elsewhere.

@rah I suppose their replacement could also be grossly negligent.

The rolling blackouts they’re proposing are in the middle of Oakland and other East Bay cities, not like out in the middle of nowhere. I’m going to go out on a limb and say it’s no harder to trim a tree in El Cerrito than it is in any other metro area, but PG&E didn’t do it.

@tek OK, so to rephrase the question: why do you expect that a replacement would not be grossly negligent? :-) Have you looked around at the world lately? Have you considered the possibility that PG&E is the best that humans in that area of the planet are able to achieve?

@rah If I thought for a moment that was true, I would abandon ship and move to the antipodes. No, these people are famously bad at it. They’re probably decent at generating shareholder value, aka privatizing the profits, but suck at doing their notional jobs.