@jump_spider @henriquesga
If we had to declare a winner to a cultural war, it would be #US #Capitalism: no matter how many criticisms it faces, it can always embrace, marginalize and extinguish them.
And yes, most powerful corporations and agents out there want we to think #OpenSource (which is a #marketing tool, thus a #capitalist one) has won.
But if we are able to see the "cultural war" we should see how it's a never-ending one.
To me, a more appropriate wording would have been "#hackers' software", since the core value that actually drive #FreeSoftware development is #Curiosity: #freedom is fundamental, but ancillary.
#RMS couldn't see this because he was born in the #USA where (and when) the #Free #Market was the main driver of their internal narrative.
But freedom is not enough: you need #communion (#commons, #community...) so that we are bound together by mutual rules in the way we use the commons.
As the fight between #FreeMarket and #Communism has shown in the 1900, we need something else to balance these two fundamental values.
And such thing is Curiosity, the will to learn and to share knowledge so that others can learn more and teach us.
On this topics I'd have a lot more things to say. If you are interested see
http://www.tesio.it/2019/06/03/what-is-informatics.html
http://www.tesio.it/2018/10/11/math-science-and-technology.html
http://www.tesio.it/documents/HACK.txt
http://www.tesio.it/documents/vademecum.txt
@henriquesga @Shamar
I recently overheard the distinction made between "open source" and "source available," which I personally enjoy. I think it's safe to conclude "open source" won the culture war, and I can image a normie saying, "Huh?' in reply after hearing "libre software" but possibly, "What's the difference?" after hearing someone point out something is merely source available