marc0s @marc0s@librem.one

While I publicly applaud and support the efforts from @purism to deploy and run #LibremOne services' platform, I think there are some valid concerns that need some public clarification: upstream projects not explicitly mentioned (not everybody will go check commits sent upstream) or features explicitly removed that hurt interoperability (mastodon reports or public/fed timeline) to name two. IMHO if that information is not ready/curated, public launch should have been delayed.

@jeremiah_ Thanks for the suggestion, but I was looking for a webmail software, to use from the browser

@zapashcanon thanks! Will have a look at it.

@njoseph @alcinnz @kev ... Which is good for non tech-savvy people IMHO. And being backed up by a for-profit but socially responsible company seems to be a good foundation for the economic sustainability of the service, which is sometimes the reason of selfhosted instances shutting down.

@njoseph @alcinnz @kev I think that the librem.one initiative is good for people who would never selfhost themselves and is offering a full ready to consume product (in contrast to a platform and a myriad of apps for consuming it)...

Any #floss recommendation of email webclient? I just have experience with roundcube but I don't know if there's something else around. I'd want something that's also mobile-friendly #selfhosting

Are we all generating high loads on librem.one matrix homserver now, maybe? I've noticed a slowdown in the app from login to channels' list display. @purism